Here is the article written from the perspective of a crypto analyst.
🔥 Key Takeaways
- Peter Schiff argues that Wall Street’s embrace of Bitcoin via Spot ETFs has effectively “killed” its original contrarian value proposition.
- The influx of institutional money has turned Bitcoin into a “crowded trade,” leading to price stagnation and high correlation with traditional equities.
- Schiff suggests that the lack of “smart money” shorting Bitcoin indicates a top-heavy market structure vulnerable to a sharp correction.
- This critique highlights a growing divide between Bitcoin as a regulated institutional asset and its original purpose as a decentralized hedge against the financial system.
The End of the Rebellion? Schiff’s Verdict on Wall Street’s Takeover
For over a decade, Peter Schiff has been the most vocal critic of Bitcoin from the traditional finance camp. As a veteran gold bug and economist, his stance has usually been dismissed by crypto natives as “old guard” thinking. However, his latest critique cuts to the heart of a debate currently raging within the digital asset community: Has the institutionalization of Bitcoin destroyed what made it special?
Schiff’s recent claims suggest that Wall Street didn’t just buy Bitcoin—they effectively killed its spirit. By transforming Bitcoin from a rebellious, contrarian asset into a regulated, ETF-approved “safe” holding, he argues that the asset has lost its edge. What was once a bet against the system has become just another cog within it.
From “Number Go Up” to a “Crowded Trade”
The core of Schiff’s argument relies on market psychology and positioning. In his view, the launch of Spot Bitcoin ETFs was the final nail in the coffin for the asset’s volatility and upside potential. When the “smart money” (institutional investors) enters a market, they typically buy before the crowd. Schiff points out that by the time the general public and major banks are fully allocated to Bitcoin, the easy money has already been made.
He describes Bitcoin as a “crowded trade.” In market analysis, a crowded trade is one where too many investors hold the same position, leaving no one left to buy and everyone vulnerable to selling if sentiment shifts. Schiff argues that the massive inflows into ETFs represent the “dumb money” piling in at the top, while the smart money is likely looking for the exit or shorting the asset.
The Stagnation Thesis: Correlation vs. Decoupling
One of the original theses for Bitcoin was its potential to be a “digital gold”—an uncorrelated asset that would hold value when stocks and bonds crashed. Schiff argues that Wall Street has reversed this dynamic. By treating Bitcoin as a “risk-on” tech asset, institutions have tightly correlated its price action with the Nasdaq and the S&P 500.
If Bitcoin moves in lockstep with Apple or Nvidia, Schiff asks: Why not just own the stocks? He views the current price stagnation not as a healthy consolidation, but as the market realizing that the asset has lost its unique catalyst. Without the narrative of being an outsider fighting the Fed, Bitcoin becomes just another speculative tech play with higher risks.
What This Means for the Crypto Market
Schiff’s analysis serves as a warning to the crypto industry. While the approval of ETFs was celebrated as a victory for “adoption,” it may have come at the cost of Bitcoin’s counter-cultural narrative. The shift from a retail-driven, decentralized movement to an institutional-grade asset class changes the mechanics of the market.
If Schiff is right, Bitcoin’s future price action may be dampened by the very regulations and institutions that were supposed to legitimize it. For investors, the takeaway is to watch whether Bitcoin can decouple from traditional markets again, or if it has permanently settled into the role of a “digital stock” managed by the very Wall Street giants it was designed to bypass.
Read Also Epochs
