🔥 Key Takeaways
- Crypto companies, including Gemini and Crypto.com, have contributed $21 million to a Trump-supporting PAC ahead of the 2022 US midterms.
- The contributions highlight the growing influence of the crypto industry in US politics and its efforts to shape regulatory and legislative outcomes.
- The move has sparked debates about the ethical implications of such large contributions and the potential impact on policy-making.
Crypto Companies Contribute $21M to Trump PAC Ahead of US Midterms
The Gemini Trust Company and the parent company of Crypto.com have made significant contributions to a Trump-supporting Political Action Committee (PAC) in the run-up to the 2022 US midterm elections. According to recent reports, these contributions total $21 million and were made in September and October of this year.
This substantial financial support underscores the growing influence of the cryptocurrency industry in the political landscape. The contributions come at a crucial time when the industry is facing increased scrutiny and calls for regulation. By backing a PAC associated with former President Donald Trump, these companies are likely aiming to secure favorable legislative and regulatory outcomes.

The move has not been without controversy. Critics argue that such large contributions can skew policy-making in favor of corporate interests, potentially at the expense of broader public welfare. On the other hand, proponents of the contributions see them as a necessary step to ensure that the voices of crypto companies are heard in the halls of power, where decisions that could significantly impact the industry are made.
Former President Trump, who has been vocal about his support for the crypto industry, has praised the contributions, stating that they will help his PAC “fight for the future of American innovation and economic freedom.” However, the ethical implications of such large-scale political donations continue to be a topic of heated debate.
As the midterms approach, the crypto industry’s involvement in political fundraising is likely to be closely watched. The outcomes of these elections could have significant implications for the regulatory environment in which crypto companies operate, making this a crucial period for both industry stakeholders and the broader public.
Conclusion
The $21 million contribution from crypto companies to a Trump-supporting PAC is a clear indication of the industry’s growing political clout. While the move is seen by some as a strategic investment in the future of the industry, others are concerned about the potential for undue influence on policy-making. As the midterms unfold, the impact of these contributions on the political landscape and regulatory outcomes will be a key focus for observers.
